1- Cardio-Oncology Research Center, Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran 2- Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran 3- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, School of Medicine, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran/ Clinical Immunology Research Center, Ali Ibne Abitaleb Hospital, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran , mehdi.heidari401@gmail.com
Abstract: (2199 Views)
Abstract
Aim. This study aimed to compare the effect of Adaptive Support Ventilation (ASV) and Synchronized Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation-Pressure Support (SIMV-PS) modes on consequence of weaning off patients from mechanical ventilator after coronary artery bypass surgery
Background. The ventilation mode used for respiratory support in patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery is very important. In addition to avoiding pressure on patient's sternotomy incision, the ventilation mode should also provide the possibility of rapid weaning of patient to avoid complications caused by long-term ventilation.
Method. In a semi-experimental study, 26 patients were ventilated with ASV as the experimental group and 26 patients were ventilated with SIMV-PS mode as the control group after coronary artery bypass graft surgery in Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Tehran, Iran. Mechanical ventilation time and endotracheal tube removal time, hemodynamic variables, and arterial blood gas analysis were compared between the two groups. Data were analyzed using an independent t-test, repeated measures ANOVA and chi-square.
Findings. Out of 52 patients, 36 (69.2 percent) were male and 16 (30.8 percent) were female. The mean time for the endotracheal tube removal was 89.42±33.83 minutes in the experimental group and 101.53±44.91 minutes in control group, which did not have a statistically significant difference (p=0.843). The mean duration of mechanical ventilation of patients in the experimental group was 483.84±158.153 minutes and in the control group, it was 541.92±257.81 minutes, which were not statistically different (p=0.332).
Conclusion. The use of ASV mode for mechanical ventilation after coronary artery bypass graft did not affect reducing the duration of mechanical ventilation and the time of endotracheal tube removal compared to SIMV-PS mode. Therefore, the use of ASV mode for respiratory support of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery should be considered according to the patient's condition and the nurses' expertise.
Ziyaeifard M, Mohammad-Taghi R, Azarfarin R, Abbaszadeh R, Heidari M. Comparison of Adaptive Support Ventilation (ASV) and Synchronized Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation-Pressure Support (SIMV-PS) modes on consequence of weaning off patients from mechanical ventilator after coronary artery bypass surgery. پرستاری قلب و عروق 2022; 11 (1) :30-38 URL: http://journal.icns.org.ir/article-1-753-en.html